POWERS v. TUCKER, 5:10cv243/MCR/MD. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120323f23
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 15, 2011 (doc. 25). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and no objections thereto being timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Rec
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 15, 2011 (doc. 25). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and no objections thereto being timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Reco..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 15, 2011 (doc. 25). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1).
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and no objections thereto being timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) challenging the conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Powers in the Circuit Court of Holmes County, Florida, case no. 07-195CF, is DENIED and the clerk is directed to close the file.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
