MOON v. UPS, 2:11-CV-00032-RWS. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120130546
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge. This case is before the Court for consideration of the Final Report and Recommendation [18] of Magistrate Judge Susan S. Cole. Following issuance of the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff filed an Objection under the heading "Letter of Appeal to Dismissal of Claim" [19]. After reviewing the record, the Court enters the following Order. Judge Cole recommends dismissal of this action because Plaintiff failed to plead facts and laws showing why he is en
Summary: ORDER RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge. This case is before the Court for consideration of the Final Report and Recommendation [18] of Magistrate Judge Susan S. Cole. Following issuance of the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff filed an Objection under the heading "Letter of Appeal to Dismissal of Claim" [19]. After reviewing the record, the Court enters the following Order. Judge Cole recommends dismissal of this action because Plaintiff failed to plead facts and laws showing why he is ent..
More
ORDER
RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge.
This case is before the Court for consideration of the Final Report and Recommendation [18] of Magistrate Judge Susan S. Cole. Following issuance of the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff filed an Objection under the heading "Letter of Appeal to Dismissal of Claim" [19]. After reviewing the record, the Court enters the following Order.
Judge Cole recommends dismissal of this action because Plaintiff failed to plead facts and laws showing why he is entitled to relief. In his Objections, Plaintiff offers additional facts to those stated in the original Complaint. However, the Court finds that these additional allegations still fail to satisfy the standard for adequately pleading a claim. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation is received with approval and adopted as the Opinion and Order of this Court. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [6] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Motion not to Dismiss his Complaint [14] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
