Filed: Nov. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , Chief District Judge . On September 29, 2017, this Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants' motion for summary judgment. In relevant part, this Court denied Defendant Ashley Lynn Mills and Defendant John Staten's motion for summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity as it related to Plaintiff's alleged unconstitutional detention. (Order of Sept. 29, 2017, Doc. 109, at 30.) Thereafter, this case was stayed pending Mills and Staten's appeal to the
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , Chief District Judge . On September 29, 2017, this Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants' motion for summary judgment. In relevant part, this Court denied Defendant Ashley Lynn Mills and Defendant John Staten's motion for summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity as it related to Plaintiff's alleged unconstitutional detention. (Order of Sept. 29, 2017, Doc. 109, at 30.) Thereafter, this case was stayed pending Mills and Staten's appeal to the E..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, Chief District Judge.
On September 29, 2017, this Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants' motion for summary judgment. In relevant part, this Court denied Defendant Ashley Lynn Mills and Defendant John Staten's motion for summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity as it related to Plaintiff's alleged unconstitutional detention. (Order of Sept. 29, 2017, Doc. 109, at 30.)
Thereafter, this case was stayed pending Mills and Staten's appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The Eleventh Circuit reversed this Court's denial of summary judgment on the issue of Mills and Staten's qualified immunity and remanded the case to this Court with instructions to conduct an individualized assessment of each Defendant's actions. (See Alcocer v. Mills et al., NO. 17-14804 (11th Cir. Oct. 9, 2018), Doc. 116.)
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandate of the EMU> United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is made the Order of this Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Stay in this case is lifted and the case is placed on the active docket of this Court. In its opinion, the Eleventh Circuit indicated the Court "may choose to conduct the analysis on the basis of the record as it currently exists, or it may allow the parties to supplement their summary-judgment submissions in light of our opinion today." (Doc. 116, at 14.) To that end. Defendants Mills and Staten move to supplement the record in this case and provide additional briefing on the issue of qualified immunity. Upon consideration, the Court finds supplements to the record and additional briefing is warranted and GRANTS Defendants' motion to supplement (doc. 117), only on the issue of Defendants Mills and Staten's qualified immunity.
The parties are DIRECTED to file an appropriate joint proposed scheduling order by Friday, November 30, 2018.