Jackson v. Danforth, 18 C 50300 (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20190507906
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 06, 2019
Latest Update: May 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. KAPALA , District Judge . Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [22] from the magistrate judge that this case be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, there being no written objection to the magistrate judge's R&R, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R. This case is clos
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. KAPALA , District Judge . Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [22] from the magistrate judge that this case be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, there being no written objection to the magistrate judge's R&R, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R. This case is close..
More
ORDER
FREDERICK J. KAPALA, District Judge.
Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [22] from the magistrate judge that this case be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, there being no written objection to the magistrate judge's R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R. This case is closed.
Source: Leagle
