THOMAS v. DAVIS, 12-cv-1189-JPG-PMF. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20140506901
Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 24) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court dismiss this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must revie
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 24) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court dismiss this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 24) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court dismiss this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the R & R. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 24) in its entirety, DISMISSES this case for failure to prosecute, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
