U.S. v. Farr, 4:15-cr-40055-JPG-4. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20180606b87
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on defendant Keenon J. Farr's motion to withdraw. (Doc. 199.) Farr had previously filed a motion that attacked his criminal sentence, but the Court explained to Farr that (1) the relief he sought was only available through a habeas petition, and (2) that if Farr did not withdraw his motion, the Court would consider it as a 2255 motion and subject it to the law's second or successive restrictions. (
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on defendant Keenon J. Farr's motion to withdraw. (Doc. 199.) Farr had previously filed a motion that attacked his criminal sentence, but the Court explained to Farr that (1) the relief he sought was only available through a habeas petition, and (2) that if Farr did not withdraw his motion, the Court would consider it as a 2255 motion and subject it to the law's second or successive restrictions. (D..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant Keenon J. Farr's motion to withdraw. (Doc. 199.) Farr had previously filed a motion that attacked his criminal sentence, but the Court explained to Farr that (1) the relief he sought was only available through a habeas petition, and (2) that if Farr did not withdraw his motion, the Court would consider it as a § 2255 motion and subject it to the law's second or successive restrictions. (Docs. 197, 198.) In response, Farr indicates that he wishes to withdraw his original motion. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Farr's motion to withdraw (Doc. 199) and FINDS AS MOOT his prior motion for relief (Doc. 197).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
