Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gibbons v. . Purchase, (1793)

Court: Court of King's Bench Number:  Visitors: 11
Judges: JONES, J.
Filed: Jul. 05, 1793
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: The payment being on an impossible day, shall be presently. 31 E., 4, 36. And where payment is not found at the day, it shall be understood that it was not made on the day on which it was due.

Here is a good action and a good declaration. The fault is only in the issue, and this is cured after verdict by the statute. 18 Eliz., 14, p. 326.

WHITLOCK, J., concurred.

Noy afterwards moved the court in the same manner as Andrews had done, but they would not arrest the judgment, but said ut supra. 5 E., 4, 32; 5 Rep., Nichol's case; 3 Cr., 287; Jones, 140; Noy, 85. *Page 747

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer