Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jenkins' Case, (1793)

Court: Court of King's Bench Number:  Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 05, 1793
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: One prescribed that all the occupiers of B. habuere et habere consuevere common, in such a place in Cornwall, ratione vicinagii , and whether this was well pleaded without alleging time out, etc., was the question. *Page 749 Rolls . It is not necessary here, because as much is implied. 21 H., 7, 25. One justified raising etc., which stopped the common way, it is not necessary to show that it was the common way, time, etc., for it is implied. CURIA (CREW, C. J., absente) e contra . For the prescr
More

One prescribed that all the occupiers of B. habuere et habere consuevere common, in such a place in Cornwall, ratione vicinagii, and whether this was well pleaded without alleging time out, etc., was the question. *Page 749 Rolls. It is not necessary here, because as much is implied. 21 H., 7, 25. One justified raising etc., which stopped the common way, it is not necessary to show that it was the common way, time, etc., for it is implied.

CURIA (CREW, C. J., absente) e contra. For the prescription is the ground of a common by vicinage. Aliter when one claims a common appendant. Poph., 201.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer