ORDER

JAMES P. O'HARA, Magistrate Judge.

By informal communication with the court, the parties in this case have jointly requested a temporary stay of discovery and scheduling-order deadlines pending a ruling on defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20).

The court may stay discovery if: (1) the case is likely to be finally concluded via a dispositive motion; (2) the facts sought through discovery would not affect the resolution of the dispositive motion; or (3) discovery on all issues posed by the complaint would be wasteful and burdensome.1 The decision whether to stay discovery rests in the sound discretion of court. As a practical matter, this calls for a case-by-case determination.

Considering the relevant factors, information provided by the parties, and the briefing related to the pending dispositive motion, the court agrees with the parties that a brief stay of all pretrial proceedings is warranted until the court rules the dispositive motion. In consideration of the foregoing, and upon good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. All deadlines set in the June 2, 2017 scheduling order (ECF No. 16), including all scheduled hearings, are terminated and will be re-set following the court's ruling on the motion for summary judgment.

2. If this case remains pending in any part after a decision on the motion for summary judgment, then within 14 days of the decision the parties shall confer and submit via email to the undersigned's chambers a status report suggesting new pre-trial deadlines.