Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bertram v. Commonwealth, (1927)

Court: Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) Number:  Visitors: 15
Judges: OPINION OF THE COURT BY DRURY, COMMISSIONER
Attorneys: BERTRAM BERTRAM for appellant. FRANK E. DAUGHERTY, Attorney General, and JOHN P. CUSICK for appellee.
Filed: Feb. 18, 1927
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Reversing. Phillip Bertram has appealed from a judgment imposing upon him five years' imprisonment in the penitentiary *Page 376 for having sexual intercourse with a female less than sixteen years of age, and not his wife. The proof showed this was committed in the fall of the year 1925. The young woman became fifteen on October 17, 1925, and Phillip Bertram became eighteen on the 16th of July of that year. The court should have instructed the jury under subsection 5 of section 1155, and the ins
More

Reversing.

Phillip Bertram has appealed from a judgment imposing upon him five years' imprisonment in the penitentiary *Page 376 for having sexual intercourse with a female less than sixteen years of age, and not his wife. The proof showed this was committed in the fall of the year 1925. The young woman became fifteen on October 17, 1925, and Phillip Bertram became eighteen on the 16th of July of that year. The court should have instructed the jury under subsection 5 of section 1155, and the instruction drawn under subsection 2 thereof was erroneous. The defendant shall have a new trial, in the conduct of which the court will observe what we have said here and in Render v. Com., 206 Ky. 1, 266 S.W. 914; Hewitt v. Com.,216 Ky. 72, 287 S.W. 223, and Hunley v. Com., 217 Ky. 675,290 S.W. 511.

The judgment is reversed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer