Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Nelson, 17-0246-01. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana Number: infdco20180508a80 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 03, 2018
Latest Update: May 03, 2018
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON FELONY GUILTY PLEA BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES , Magistrate Judge . Upon reference of the District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and with the written and oral consent of the defendant, this cause came before the undersigned U. S. Magistrate Judge on May 3, 2018, for administration of guilty plea and allocution of the defendant Daryl Nelson under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant was present with h
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON FELONY GUILTY PLEA BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Upon reference of the District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and with the written and oral consent of the defendant, this cause came before the undersigned U. S. Magistrate Judge on May 3, 2018, for administration of guilty plea and allocution of the defendant Daryl Nelson under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant was present with his counsel, Mr. Kevin Johnson.

After said hearing, it is the finding of the undersigned that the defendant is fully competent, that his plea of guilty is knowing and voluntary, and his guilty plea to Count One of the Indictment, is fully supported by a written factual basis for each of the essential elements of the offense. In addition, both the government and the defendant have waived their right to object to the report and recommendation. Accordingly,

IT IS RECOMMENDED that the District Court ACCEPT the guilty plea of the defendant Daryl Nelson in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement filed in the record of these proceedings, and that Daryl Nelson be finally adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the District Court ACCEPT defendant's agreement to forfeit and abandon any claim, right, title, or interest he may have in the firearm(s) and ammunition seized in this matter.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to the parties' waiver of their right to object, that the District Court immediately adopt the report and recommendation without passage of the customary delays.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer