ARORA v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, 12-13773. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20130820a51
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2013
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's Request not to Schedule Hearing in August, 2013 [Doc. #22] is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court does not intend to schedule any hearings during that time. The Court has entered an Order granting Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Plaintiff filed a timely response to the Defendant's motion. Plaintiff's 14 days to file objections to the Order would not run until September 3, 2013. Moreover, while an extension of time is not
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's Request not to Schedule Hearing in August, 2013 [Doc. #22] is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court does not intend to schedule any hearings during that time. The Court has entered an Order granting Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Plaintiff filed a timely response to the Defendant's motion. Plaintiff's 14 days to file objections to the Order would not run until September 3, 2013. Moreover, while an extension of time is not g..
More
ORDER
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff's Request not to Schedule Hearing in August, 2013 [Doc. #22] is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court does not intend to schedule any hearings during that time.
The Court has entered an Order granting Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Plaintiff filed a timely response to the Defendant's motion. Plaintiff's 14 days to file objections to the Order would not run until September 3, 2013. Moreover, while an extension of time is not guaranteed as a matter of right, Plaintiff may request additional time to file objections owing to her absence if she believes an extension is necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
