WALK v. MACKIE, 13-cv-14429. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140902g28
Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JUNE 25, 2014 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 12), (2) DENYING THE APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 1); (3) DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND (4) DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR BOND (ECF NO. 11) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. On June 25, 2014, Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court deny Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, deny a certificate of ap
Summary: ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JUNE 25, 2014 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 12), (2) DENYING THE APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 1); (3) DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND (4) DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR BOND (ECF NO. 11) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. On June 25, 2014, Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court deny Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, deny a certificate of app..
More
ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JUNE 25, 2014 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 12), (2) DENYING THE APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 1); (3) DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND (4) DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR BOND (ECF NO. 11)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
On June 25, 2014, Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court deny Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, deny a certificate of appealability, and deny the Petitioner's Motion for Bond. (ECF No. 12). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, DENIES the application for a writ of habeas corpus, DENIES a certificate of appealability, and DENIES Petitioner's Motion for Bond.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
