BROWN v. OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC., 14-11398. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20150203c47
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2015
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff's self-styled "Motion; Grievance of the Defendant's Outrageous Malfeasance Conduct as Officers of the Court" [Doc. #52]. He cites the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct and the Sixth Amendment. In terms of relief, he merely asks the Court "to address the issues." If Plaintiff believes in good faith that opposing counsel has violated the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct, his remedy is with the Attorney Grievance
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff's self-styled "Motion; Grievance of the Defendant's Outrageous Malfeasance Conduct as Officers of the Court" [Doc. #52]. He cites the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct and the Sixth Amendment. In terms of relief, he merely asks the Court "to address the issues." If Plaintiff believes in good faith that opposing counsel has violated the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct, his remedy is with the Attorney Grievance C..
More
ORDER
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff's self-styled "Motion; Grievance of the Defendant's Outrageous Malfeasance Conduct as Officers of the Court" [Doc. #52]. He cites the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct and the Sixth Amendment. In terms of relief, he merely asks the Court "to address the issues."
If Plaintiff believes in good faith that opposing counsel has violated the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct, his remedy is with the Attorney Grievance Commission, not with this Court. Moreover, his motion does not ask for any specific relief, and it is not this Court's role to guess at what the Plaintiff wants. Finally, the Sixth Amendment applies to criminal cases. This is a civil case.
Plaintiff's motion [Doc. #52] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
