WEST v. SAGINAW TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, 13-14551. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20160420g03
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [35] ON THE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [29, 30] JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Majzoub's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 35) recommending the Court deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 30) and grant defendant's motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 29.) The parties were required to file specific written objections within fourteen days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 7
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [35] ON THE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [29, 30] JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Majzoub's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 35) recommending the Court deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 30) and grant defendant's motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 29.) The parties were required to file specific written objections within fourteen days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72..
More
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [35] ON THE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [29, 30]
JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Majzoub's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 35) recommending the Court deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 30) and grant defendant's motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 29.) The parties were required to file specific written objections within fourteen days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d). No objections were filed. Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed this case in its entirety, and upon completion of that, is adopted, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 30) is denied, and defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 29) is granted. The case is dismissed.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The parties, by failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, have waived any further right of appeal. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Source: Leagle
