Ellis v. Minnesota, 18-CV-0342 (NEB/TNL). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20181212c41
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NANCY E. BRASEL , District Judge . The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated October 30, 2018 [ECF No. 15]. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793 , 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NANCY E. BRASEL , District Judge . The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated October 30, 2018 [ECF No. 15]. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793 , 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
NANCY E. BRASEL, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated October 30, 2018 [ECF No. 15]. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 15] is ACCEPTED;
1. Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody [ECF No. 1] is DENIED;
2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 7] is GRANTED;
3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
4. No certificate of appealability be issued.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
