CREWS v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, 363 S.W.3d 132 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco120727000530
Visitors: 29
Filed: May 01, 2012
Latest Update: May 01, 2012
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Elizabeth Crews appeals the judgment in favor of the Director of Revenue, State of Missouri ("DOR") on Crews' petition for review of the revocation of her driver's license pursuant to Section 302.505 RSMo Supp.2001. We find that the trial court did not err in entering judgment in favor of the DOR on Crews' petition for trial de novo. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Elizabeth Crews appeals the judgment in favor of the Director of Revenue, State of Missouri ("DOR") on Crews' petition for review of the revocation of her driver's license pursuant to Section 302.505 RSMo Supp.2001. We find that the trial court did not err in entering judgment in favor of the DOR on Crews' petition for trial de novo. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons ..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Elizabeth Crews appeals the judgment in favor of the Director of Revenue, State of Missouri ("DOR") on Crews' petition for review of the revocation of her driver's license pursuant to Section 302.505 RSMo Supp.2001. We find that the trial court did not err in entering judgment in favor of the DOR on Crews' petition for trial de novo. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
