Watson v. Boyd, 4:17-CV-2187 RLW. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20190410d86
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RONNIE L. WHITE , District Judge . This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Discovery Pending the Resolution of Motions Before the Court, or in the Alternative, Motion for Amended Scheduling Order ("Motion to Stay"; ECF No. 74) and Plaintiff's 56(D) Motion to Dismiss or Defer Summary Judgment (ECF No. 103). Plaintiff's Motions sought relief from the scheduling order until the Court ruled on various discovery motions pending before the Court. On Marc
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RONNIE L. WHITE , District Judge . This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Discovery Pending the Resolution of Motions Before the Court, or in the Alternative, Motion for Amended Scheduling Order ("Motion to Stay"; ECF No. 74) and Plaintiff's 56(D) Motion to Dismiss or Defer Summary Judgment (ECF No. 103). Plaintiff's Motions sought relief from the scheduling order until the Court ruled on various discovery motions pending before the Court. On March..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RONNIE L. WHITE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Discovery Pending the Resolution of Motions Before the Court, or in the Alternative, Motion for Amended Scheduling Order ("Motion to Stay"; ECF No. 74) and Plaintiff's 56(D) Motion to Dismiss or Defer Summary Judgment (ECF No. 103). Plaintiff's Motions sought relief from the scheduling order until the Court ruled on various discovery motions pending before the Court. On March 28, 2019, the Court extended Plaintiff's deadline for responding to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment until May 17, 2019. (ECF No. 108). On April 5, 2019, this Court ruled on the pending discovery motions. Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Stay and Motion to Dismiss or Defer Summary Judgment, without prejudice, because the Court has ruled on the pending discovery motions and granted Plaintiff additional time to respond Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Any further requests for relief or additional time should be filed as new motions.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending the Resolution of Motions Before the Court, or in the Alternative, Motion for Amended Scheduling Order (ECF No. 74) and Plaintiff's 56(D) Motion to Dismiss or Defer Summary Judgment (ECF No. 103) are DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
