THACKER v. ASTRUE, 3:11-CV-00246-GCM-DSC. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120207a29
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the memorandum and recommendation of United States Magistrate David S. Cayer, filed November 28, 2011. The parties were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), written objections to the memorandum and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service of the memorandum. Plaintiff timely filed an objection. Defendant timely filed a reply. After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's m
Summary: ORDER Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the memorandum and recommendation of United States Magistrate David S. Cayer, filed November 28, 2011. The parties were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), written objections to the memorandum and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service of the memorandum. Plaintiff timely filed an objection. Defendant timely filed a reply. After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's me..
More
ORDER
Graham C. Mullen, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the memorandum and recommendation of United States Magistrate David S. Cayer, filed November 28, 2011. The parties were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), written objections to the memorandum and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service of the memorandum. Plaintiff timely filed an objection. Defendant timely filed a reply.
After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's memorandum, Plaintiff's objections thereto, and Defendant's reply, the Court concludes that the recommendation to deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, to grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and to affirm the Commissioner's determination is correct and in accordance with law. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate are accepted, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the Commissioner's determination is AFFIRMED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the memorandum and recommendation of the magistrate is hereby AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
