Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. ADAMS, 3:10-CR-00238-RJC. (2013)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20130607c89 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2013
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the defendant's pro se motions for a hearing regarding his plea, (Doc. No. 568), and to withdraw his plea, (Doc. No. 578). The defendant is currently represented by counsel. (Doc. No. 548: Appointment of Counsel). Local Criminal Rule 47.1(H) requires motions to be filed by counsel unless a defendant has formally waived his right to counsel in the presence of a judicial officer. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, that t
More

ORDER

ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the defendant's pro se motions for a hearing regarding his plea, (Doc. No. 568), and to withdraw his plea, (Doc. No. 578).

The defendant is currently represented by counsel. (Doc. No. 548: Appointment of Counsel). Local Criminal Rule 47.1(H) requires motions to be filed by counsel unless a defendant has formally waived his right to counsel in the presence of a judicial officer.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, that the defendant's pro se motions for a hearing on his plea and to withdraw his guilty plea are DENIED without prejudice to be pursued by counsel if deemed advisable.

The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this order to the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and to the United States Attorney.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer