Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WATTERSON v. BURGESS, 3:13-CV-159-FDW-DCK. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20151218d25 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiffs "Motion To Reconsider" (Document No. 99) filed on December 16, 2015. The pending motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will grant the motion. Plaintiffs now request that the undersigned reconsider the "Order" (Document No. 93) finding th
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiffs "Motion To Reconsider" (Document No. 99) filed on December 16, 2015. The pending motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will grant the motion.

Plaintiffs now request that the undersigned reconsider the "Order" (Document No. 93) finding that Plaintiff Jeffrey R. Watterson failed to sign the "Second Amended Complaint" (Document No. 83). After further review of the record and the "Second Amended Complaint" (Document No. 83), the undersigned agrees that both Plaintiffs, Randolph A. Watterson and Jeffrey R. Watterson, signed that document. See (Document No. 83, p.38). As such, the Court will accept the "Second Amended Complaint" as being filed by both Plaintiffs.

CONCLUSION

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiffs "Motion To Reconsider" (Document No. 99) is GRANTED. The "Second Amended Complaint" (Document No. 83) is deemed to be filed by both Plaintiffs. The Clerk of Court shall update the docket for this case accordingly.

The Clerk of Court is further directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiffs, and the pro se Defendant at the addresses listed on the docket for the case by certified U.S. Mail, return receipt requested.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer