U.S. v. Odman, 4:96-cr-00053-MR-1. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160425847
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's "Motion to Atler [sic] and/or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)" [Doc. 743]. Upon review of the Defendant's motion, the Court finds no basis in law to reconsider its prior Order denying the Defendant's Motion to Correct Error in the Record [Doc. 742]. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's "Motion to Atler [sic] and/or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)" [Doc. 743] i
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's "Motion to Atler [sic] and/or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)" [Doc. 743]. Upon review of the Defendant's motion, the Court finds no basis in law to reconsider its prior Order denying the Defendant's Motion to Correct Error in the Record [Doc. 742]. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's "Motion to Atler [sic] and/or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)" [Doc. 743] is..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's "Motion to Atler [sic] and/or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)" [Doc. 743].
Upon review of the Defendant's motion, the Court finds no basis in law to reconsider its prior Order denying the Defendant's Motion to Correct Error in the Record [Doc. 742].
Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's "Motion to Atler [sic] and/or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)" [Doc. 743] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
