Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gaston v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc., 5:16-CV-009-MOC-DCK. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180518c91 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 17, 2018
Latest Update: May 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendants' "Motion For Pro Hac Vice Admission Of Cindy D. Hanson" (Document No. 49) filed May 17, 2018. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion, without prejudice. It appears that the pending motion d
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendants' "Motion For Pro Hac Vice Admission Of Cindy D. Hanson" (Document No. 49) filed May 17, 2018. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion, without prejudice.

It appears that the pending motion does not comply with the recently revised Local Rules of this Court which require such motion to "be submitted to the Court upon the forms prescribed by this Court." Local Rule 83.1(c)(2); see also "Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice" at http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov/local-forms/civil-forms.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants' "Motion For Pro Hac Vice Admission Of Cindy D. Hanson" (Document No. 49) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants may refile their request utilizing the Court form cited above.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer