Kelly v. Solomom, 3:17-cv-311-FDW. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190125d33
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Deem Answer Timely Filed, (Doc. No. 48). 1 Defendants claim that an Answer was not timely filed due to excusable neglect and that accepting the Answer as timely filed will not prejudice Plaintiff. The Court agrees. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Deem Answer Timely Filed is GRANTED . FootNotes 1. This Motion was filed on behalf of all Defendants except
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Deem Answer Timely Filed, (Doc. No. 48). 1 Defendants claim that an Answer was not timely filed due to excusable neglect and that accepting the Answer as timely filed will not prejudice Plaintiff. The Court agrees. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Deem Answer Timely Filed is GRANTED . FootNotes 1. This Motion was filed on behalf of all Defendants except G..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Deem Answer Timely Filed, (Doc. No. 48).1 Defendants claim that an Answer was not timely filed due to excusable neglect and that accepting the Answer as timely filed will not prejudice Plaintiff. The Court agrees. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Deem Answer Timely Filed is GRANTED.
FootNotes
1. This Motion was filed on behalf of all Defendants except G. Hayes, who has separate counsel.
Source: Leagle
