United States v. Saldana, 5:12-CR-00049-KDB-DCK. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20200304c68
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: ORDER KENNETH D. BELL , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se for a request for transcripts at government expense (Doc. No. 136) and a pro se motion to stay forfeiture proceedings (Doc. No. 147). The Court has reviewed the motions and finds that the motions are moot in that his appeal has been filed, heard, and the judgment affirmed and a final order and judgment confirming forfeiture was entered by the Court on May 5, 2019 (Doc. No. 155). I
Summary: ORDER KENNETH D. BELL , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se for a request for transcripts at government expense (Doc. No. 136) and a pro se motion to stay forfeiture proceedings (Doc. No. 147). The Court has reviewed the motions and finds that the motions are moot in that his appeal has been filed, heard, and the judgment affirmed and a final order and judgment confirming forfeiture was entered by the Court on May 5, 2019 (Doc. No. 155). IT..
More
ORDER
KENNETH D. BELL, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se for a request for transcripts at government expense (Doc. No. 136) and a pro se motion to stay forfeiture proceedings (Doc. No. 147).
The Court has reviewed the motions and finds that the motions are moot in that his appeal has been filed, heard, and the judgment affirmed and a final order and judgment confirming forfeiture was entered by the Court on May 5, 2019 (Doc. No. 155).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's motions for transcripts and to stay forfeiture proceedings, (Doc. No. 136 and Doc. No. 147) are DENIED.
Source: Leagle
