U.S. v. GRAHAM, 8:12CR20. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120209c03
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2012
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [14]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given a 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by March 15, 2012. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [14] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before March 15, 2012. 2. The ends of justice have been served by gra
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [14]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given a 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by March 15, 2012. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [14] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before March 15, 2012. 2. The ends of justice have been served by gran..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [14]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given a 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by March 15, 2012.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [14] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before March 15, 2012.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between February 14, 2012 and March 15, 2012, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B).
3. Trial will be set by further order of the court.
Source: Leagle
