BARNHARDT v. OPEN HARVEST COOPERATIVE, 4:12CV3156. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20130816b43
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON REQUESTS FOR COSTS WARREN K. URBOM, Senior District Judge. Now before me are the Findings and Recommendation on Taxation of Costs filed by United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart on July 23, 2013. (ECF No. 50.) Judge Zwart recommends that the defendant's request for costs, (ECF No. 44), be granted; that costs be taxed in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff in the amount of $1,737.50; and that the plaintiff's motion to stay the imposition of costs, (E
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON REQUESTS FOR COSTS WARREN K. URBOM, Senior District Judge. Now before me are the Findings and Recommendation on Taxation of Costs filed by United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart on July 23, 2013. (ECF No. 50.) Judge Zwart recommends that the defendant's request for costs, (ECF No. 44), be granted; that costs be taxed in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff in the amount of $1,737.50; and that the plaintiff's motion to stay the imposition of costs, (EC..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON REQUESTS FOR COSTS
WARREN K. URBOM, Senior District Judge.
Now before me are the Findings and Recommendation on Taxation of Costs filed by United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart on July 23, 2013. (ECF No. 50.) Judge Zwart recommends that the defendant's request for costs, (ECF No. 44), be granted; that costs be taxed in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff in the amount of $1,737.50; and that the plaintiff's motion to stay the imposition of costs, (ECF No. 48), be denied.
No timely objections to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (allowing parties to file objections within 14 days of service of a copy of the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation). Nevertheless, I have conducted a de novo review, and I find that Judge Zwart's findings and recommendation should be adopted in full.
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge's findings and recommendation, (ECF No. 50), are adopted;
2. The defendant's request for costs, (ECF No. 44), is granted;
3. Costs are taxed in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff in the amount of $1,737.50; and
4. The plaintiff's motion to stay, (ECF No. 48), is denied.
Source: Leagle
