Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. HORACEK, 4:14CR3048. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20141014a96 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge. Defendant has moved to continue defendant's change of plea hearing. (Filing No. 44). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 44), is granted. 2) The defendant's plea hearing will be held before the undersig
More

ORDER

CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant has moved to continue defendant's change of plea hearing. (Filing No. 44). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 44), is granted. 2) The defendant's plea hearing will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on November 6, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.. The defendant is ordered to appear at this hearing. 3) For the reasons stated by counsel, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing defendant's plea hearing outweigh the best interest of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the time between today's date and the district court judge's acceptance or rejection of the anticipated plea of guilty shall be excluded for speedy trial calculation purposes. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer