U.S. v. Quiroga, 8:15CR217. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20160505c05
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 04, 2016
Latest Update: May 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Hamolequet Adi Quiroga (Quiroga) (Filing No. 64). Quiroga seeks a continuance of the trial scheduled for May 9, 2016. Quiroga's counsel represents that government's counsel would have no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted. Trial will be continued as to both defendants. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Quiroga's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 64
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Hamolequet Adi Quiroga (Quiroga) (Filing No. 64). Quiroga seeks a continuance of the trial scheduled for May 9, 2016. Quiroga's counsel represents that government's counsel would have no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted. Trial will be continued as to both defendants. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Quiroga's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 64)..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Hamolequet Adi Quiroga (Quiroga) (Filing No. 64). Quiroga seeks a continuance of the trial scheduled for May 9, 2016. Quiroga's counsel represents that government's counsel would have no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted. Trial will be continued as to both defendants.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Quiroga's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 64) is granted.
2. Trial of this matter as to both defendants is re-scheduled for June 13, 2016, before Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between May 4, 2016, and June 13, 2016, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
