Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Trail, 4:17CR3143. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20180329e26 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved to continue his plea hearing. As explained by counsel, Defendant needs additional time to consider the proposed plea agreement. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue is granted. 2) Defendant's plea hearing will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on April 5, 2018 at 12
More

ORDER

Defendant has moved to continue his plea hearing. As explained by counsel, Defendant needs additional time to consider the proposed plea agreement. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant's motion to continue is granted. 2) Defendant's plea hearing will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on April 5, 2018 at 12:00 p.m. (noon). Defendant is ordered to appear at this hearing. 3) For the reasons stated by counsel, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing Defendant's plea hearing outweigh the best interest of Defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the time between today's date and the district court judge's acceptance or rejection of the anticipated plea of guilty shall be excluded for speedy trial calculation purposes. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court's local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer