U.S. v. Brown, 8:18CR314. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190327f35
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant Adell's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [62]. Counsel is scheduled to be in trial before Judge Robert F. Rossiter on April 1, 2019 and seeks additional time to complete the investigation into this matter. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant Adell's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [62] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for April 2, 2019, is co
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant Adell's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [62]. Counsel is scheduled to be in trial before Judge Robert F. Rossiter on April 1, 2019 and seeks additional time to complete the investigation into this matter. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant Adell's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [62] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for April 2, 2019, is con..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Defendant Adell's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [62]. Counsel is scheduled to be in trial before Judge Robert F. Rossiter on April 1, 2019 and seeks additional time to complete the investigation into this matter. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant Adell's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [62] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for April 2, 2019, is continued to June 4, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and June 4, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
