Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STATE v. BISHOP, 123 A.3d 729 (2015)

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey Number: innjco20151021280 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2015
Summary: PER CURIAM . The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Lisa's opinion reported at 429 N.J.Super. 533 , 60 A.3d 806 (App.Div.2013). For affirmance-Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON and SOLOMON-5. Opposed—None. Not Participating —Justice FERNANDEZ-VINA and Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned)—2.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Lisa's opinion reported at 429 N.J.Super. 533, 60 A.3d 806 (App.Div.2013).

For affirmance-Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON and SOLOMON-5.

Opposed—None.

Not Participating—Justice FERNANDEZ-VINA and Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned)—2.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer