STATE v. VIGIL, 31 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20130109355
Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2012
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION CASTILLO, Judge. Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. Reversed. IT IS SO ORDERED. RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge and LINDA M. VANZI, Judg
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION CASTILLO, Judge. Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. Reversed. IT IS SO ORDERED. RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge and LINDA M. VANZI, Judge..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. Reversed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge and LINDA M. VANZI, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
