STATE v. ARCHULETA, 114 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20130124335
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2012
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge and R
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge and RO..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge and RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
