STATE v. ROBERTS, 32 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20140117346
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2013
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge. { 1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reason
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge. { 1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{¶ 1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
{¶ 2} Affirmed.
{¶ 3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge and MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
