STATE v. SMITH, 216. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20140117368
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2013
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge. { 1} The State has appealed from the dismissal of its ca
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge. { 1} The State has appealed from the dismissal of its cas..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{¶ 1} The State has appealed from the dismissal of its case with prejudice. We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition on October 29, 2013, proposing to affirm. The State has filed a response with this Court indicating that it will not be filing a memorandum in opposition.
{¶ 2} Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm.
{¶ 3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge and JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
