STATE v. BACA, 35 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20160915278
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2016
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL , Chief Judge . {1} Defendant Adelina Baca appeals from the di
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL , Chief Judge . {1} Defendant Adelina Baca appeals from the dis..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Chief Judge.
{1} Defendant Adelina Baca appeals from the district court's affirmance of her conviction after a bench trial in metropolitan court for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to agree with and adopt the district court's memorandum opinion and affirm Defendant's conviction. Defendant filed a notice that she will not file a memorandum in opposition. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition and herein, and for the reasons articulated in the memorandum opinion of the district court, we affirm Defendant's conviction.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge and JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
