Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Silva v. Social Security Administration, CIV 16-0956KBM. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20171207d21 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(D) KAREN B. MOLZEN , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Stipulated Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act filed on December 6, 2017. [Doc. 26]. The parties have stipulated to EAJA fees in the amount of $7,500.00 for work performed in 2016 and 2017. The Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the motion is well-
More

ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(D)

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Stipulated Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act filed on December 6, 2017. [Doc. 26]. The parties have stipulated to EAJA fees in the amount of $7,500.00 for work performed in 2016 and 2017. The Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the motion is well-taken and will be granted.

Wherefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted, and Plaintiff is awarded $7,500.00 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591-93 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff's counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff's counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer