LeBlanc v. Halliburton Company, 17-718 KG/GJF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20180425d37
Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER GREGORY J. FOURATT , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' "Opposed Motion for Protective Order Regarding Representative Discovery" ("Motion") filed on February 23, 2018. ECF No. 37. Defendant responded on March 9, 2018. ECF No. 39. Plaintiffs replied on March 22, 2018. ECF No. 40. The Court conducted a hearing on the Motion on April 24, 2018. Based on its review of the parties' briefing, the arguments presented, and for the further reasons stated in o
Summary: ORDER GREGORY J. FOURATT , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' "Opposed Motion for Protective Order Regarding Representative Discovery" ("Motion") filed on February 23, 2018. ECF No. 37. Defendant responded on March 9, 2018. ECF No. 39. Plaintiffs replied on March 22, 2018. ECF No. 40. The Court conducted a hearing on the Motion on April 24, 2018. Based on its review of the parties' briefing, the arguments presented, and for the further reasons stated in op..
More
ORDER
GREGORY J. FOURATT, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' "Opposed Motion for Protective Order Regarding Representative Discovery" ("Motion") filed on February 23, 2018. ECF No. 37. Defendant responded on March 9, 2018. ECF No. 39. Plaintiffs replied on March 22, 2018. ECF No. 40. The Court conducted a hearing on the Motion on April 24, 2018.
Based on its review of the parties' briefing, the arguments presented, and for the further reasons stated in open court, the Court HEREBY ORDERS the following:
1. Plaintiff's Motion [ECF No. 37] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
2. Plaintiff's request to limit discovery to a representative sample prior to the certification of a collective is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. Requests for Production 26-106 propounded by Defendant to Plaintiff Keith Briggs are QUASHED.
4. Plaintiff Briggs is ORDERED to respond to Defendant's seventeen interrogatories and Requests for Production 1-25 no later than May 15, 2018.
5. Defendant may depose Plaintiff Brent LeBlanc prior to any decision on the certification of the collective for no more than seven hours, and may depose Plaintiff Briggs for no more than four hours.
6. Discovery SHALL BE STAYED as to all other putative plaintiffs who enter the case between the date of this Order and the decision on Plaintiff's "Motion for Conditional Certification" [ECF No. 27].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
