Maxwell v. Esper, 2:18-00824-GBW-SMV. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20190329f87
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 12). Plaintiff does not oppose this motion and the Court finds good cause to grant it. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Defendant Mark T. Esper, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army, shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Comp
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 12). Plaintiff does not oppose this motion and the Court finds good cause to grant it. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Defendant Mark T. Esper, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army, shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Compl..
More
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 12). Plaintiff does not oppose this motion and the Court finds good cause to grant it.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Defendant Mark T. Esper, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army, shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 12) by April 29, 2019.
Source: Leagle
