PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. DELANEY, 2:11-cv-00678-LRH-PAL. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140612d26
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Progressive Casualty Insurance Company's Memorandum Regarding Sealed Documents (Dkt. #148) filed June 6, 2014. The court has considered the Memorandum. On May 13, 2014, the court entered an Order (Dkt. #139) denying Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Company's Motion to Seal Exhibits K-N to the Declaration of Joseph Saka (Dkt. #133) and allowing Progressive to file a memorandum to make a particularized showin
Summary: ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Progressive Casualty Insurance Company's Memorandum Regarding Sealed Documents (Dkt. #148) filed June 6, 2014. The court has considered the Memorandum. On May 13, 2014, the court entered an Order (Dkt. #139) denying Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Company's Motion to Seal Exhibits K-N to the Declaration of Joseph Saka (Dkt. #133) and allowing Progressive to file a memorandum to make a particularized showing..
More
ORDER
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Progressive Casualty Insurance Company's Memorandum Regarding Sealed Documents (Dkt. #148) filed June 6, 2014. The court has considered the Memorandum.
On May 13, 2014, the court entered an Order (Dkt. #139) denying Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Company's Motion to Seal Exhibits K-N to the Declaration of Joseph Saka (Dkt. #133) and allowing Progressive to file a memorandum to make a particularized showing of good cause why those Exhibits should remain under seal pursuant to Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006). Progressive's Memorandum represents that it is not necessary for the documents to remain under seal in the form they were produced. See Memorandum (Dkt. #148) at 2:18-19.
For these reasons,
IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall unseal the Declaration of Joseph Saka (Dkt. #132).1
FootNotes
1. The Declaration contains three other exhibits, marked as Exhibits J, O, and P. Those exhibits were not filed under seal. See Redacted Declaration (Dkt. #133). Accordingly, the entirety of the Declaration (Dkt. #132) that was originally filed under seal no longer needs to be maintained under seal.
Source: Leagle
