Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. $177,844.68 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 2:13-CV-100 JCM (GWF) (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150401a13 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is plaintiff United States of America's (hereinafter "plaintiff") motion to amend complaint. (Doc. # 67). Claimants Charles Burton Ritchie, Stephanie Ritchie, Benjamin Galecki, and ZIW, LLC (collectively "claimants") filed a response. (Doc. # 68). Plaintiff did not file a reply, and the deadline to reply has now passed. In their response to plaintiff's motion, claimants state that they have no objection to the granting of p
More

ORDER

Presently before the court is plaintiff United States of America's (hereinafter "plaintiff") motion to amend complaint. (Doc. # 67). Claimants Charles Burton Ritchie, Stephanie Ritchie, Benjamin Galecki, and ZIW, LLC (collectively "claimants") filed a response. (Doc. # 68). Plaintiff did not file a reply, and the deadline to reply has now passed.

In their response to plaintiff's motion, claimants state that they have no objection to the granting of plaintiff's motion. (Doc. # 68). Further, the court finds that the reasoning set forth in plaintiff's motion supports allowing plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff attaches a proposed amended complaint to its motion in accordance with Local Rule 15-1(a). (Doc. # 67-1).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff United States of America's motion to amend complaint, (doc. # 67), be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file its amended complaint, (doc. # 67-1), on the docket within seven (7) days of the entry of this order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer