Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LISLE v. BAKER, 2:03-cv-01006-MMD-CWH. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160115k29 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . In this capital habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Kevin James Lisle, was to file a supplement to his opposition to the respondents' motion to dismiss by January 15, 2016. See Order entered November 16, 2015 (dkt. no. 236). On January 8, 2016, Lisle filed a motion for extension of time (dkt. no. 237), requesting a 60-day extension of time — to March 15, 2016 — to file the supplement to his opposition to the motion to dismiss. Petitioner's counsel
More

ORDER

In this capital habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Kevin James Lisle, was to file a supplement to his opposition to the respondents' motion to dismiss by January 15, 2016. See Order entered November 16, 2015 (dkt. no. 236).

On January 8, 2016, Lisle filed a motion for extension of time (dkt. no. 237), requesting a 60-day extension of time — to March 15, 2016 — to file the supplement to his opposition to the motion to dismiss. Petitioner's counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of delay caused by the budgeting process, the complexity of this matter, and his obligations in other cases. Respondents' counsel does not oppose the motion for extension of time. The Court finds that the motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and there is good cause for the requested extension of time. The Court will grant the motion for extension of time.

It is therefore ordered that petitioner's motion for extension of time (dkt. no. 237) is granted. Petitioner shall have until and including March 15, 2016, to file the supplement to his opposition to the motion to dismiss. Thereafter, the schedule for further proceedings shall be governed by the order entered on November 16, 2015 (dkt. no. 236).

The Court will not look favorably upon any motion to further extend the deadline for the supplement to Lisle's opposition to the motion to dismiss.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer