Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TOPOLEWSKI v. BLYSCHAK, 2:16-cv-01588-JAD-NJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160722j32 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TOEXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TIM KILBRAI TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR 7-1, Plaintiffs Gary Topolewski, Bud Zukaloff and Metal Jeans, Inc. ("Plaintiffs"'), by and through their counsel, Joel Hansen, Esq. of the law firm of Cooper Levenson, P.A. and Defendant Tim Kilbrai ("Defendant"), by and through his counsel, Robert E. Schumacher, Esq. and Liane S. Binowitz, Esq. of the law firm Gordon & Ree
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TOEXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TIM KILBRAI TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to LR 7-1, Plaintiffs Gary Topolewski, Bud Zukaloff and Metal Jeans, Inc. ("Plaintiffs"'), by and through their counsel, Joel Hansen, Esq. of the law firm of Cooper Levenson, P.A. and Defendant Tim Kilbrai ("Defendant"), by and through his counsel, Robert E. Schumacher, Esq. and Liane S. Binowitz, Esq. of the law firm Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP ("GR"), hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed on July 5, 2016. Defendant's response is currently due on July 28, 2016 and pursuant to this Stipulation, will be continued to August 15, 2016.

Said continuance is being stipulated to in order to give Defendant, Tim Kilbrai, adequate time to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint in light of GR's recent retention. There have been no previous continuances or extensions requested regarding the filing of Defendant's response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer