Filed: Nov. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION RE: U.S. BANK'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOUNTAIN GATE AT SUNRISE MOUNTAIN HOA'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST] RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association, solely as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America National Association as Successor by Merger to Lasalle Bank National Association as Trustee for Certificateholders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2005-
Summary: STIPULATION RE: U.S. BANK'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOUNTAIN GATE AT SUNRISE MOUNTAIN HOA'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST] RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association, solely as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America National Association as Successor by Merger to Lasalle Bank National Association as Trustee for Certificateholders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2005-H..
More
STIPULATION RE: U.S. BANK'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOUNTAIN GATE AT SUNRISE MOUNTAIN HOA'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
[FIRST REQUEST]
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association, solely as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America National Association as Successor by Merger to Lasalle Bank National Association as Trustee for Certificateholders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2005-HES, ("U.S. Bank, as Trustee"), by and through its counsel of record Kent Larsen, Esq. and Christopher Benner, Esq. of the law firm of Smith Larsen & Wixom, and Defendant Mountain Gate at Sunrise Mountain HOA, ("Sunrise") by and through its counsel of record Kaleb. D. Anderson, Esq. and Julie A. Funai, Esq., of the law firm of Lipson, Neilson, Cole, Seltzer & Garin, P.C., agree and stipulate as follows:
1. Sunrise filed the Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint ("the Motion") on November 10,2016 [Dkt. #lS];
2. U.S. Bank's Opposition to the Motion is due November 27, 2016.
3. Due to the intervening holiday and previously arranged travel, U.S Bank's counsel has requested, and Sunrise has agreed to, a proposed extension of the above deadline to December 2, 2016.
THEREFORE, the above-referenced parties stipulate as follows:
1. U.S. Bank's Opposition to the Motion shall be filed on or before December 2, 2016; and the Reply brief of Sunrise shall be calendared based upon the actual filing date of U.S. Bank's Opposition.
2. No other calendared dates are being extended at this time.
This is the first request to extend the due date of U.S. Bank's Opposition, and is not intended to delay these proceedings. This request will not cause any prejudice to the parties in this matter.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
