Filed: Jul. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) ECF No. 80 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiff MARK HUNT ("Hunt"), and Defendants ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP ("Zuffa") and DANA WHITE ("White") hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Hunt to file his Opposition to Zuffa and White's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 71], filed June 26, 2017, from July 10, 2017 until
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) ECF No. 80 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiff MARK HUNT ("Hunt"), and Defendants ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP ("Zuffa") and DANA WHITE ("White") hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Hunt to file his Opposition to Zuffa and White's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 71], filed June 26, 2017, from July 10, 2017 until J..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST)
ECF No. 80
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiff MARK HUNT ("Hunt"), and Defendants ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP ("Zuffa") and DANA WHITE ("White") hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Hunt to file his Opposition to Zuffa and White's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 71], filed June 26, 2017, from July 10, 2017 until July 17, 2017. This stipulation is based on the following:
Zuffa and White filed their Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 71] on June 26, 2017, following a stipulated extension of time for Zuffa and White to respond to Hunt's First Amended Complaint. Hunt's opposition is presently due July 10, 2017. Hunt, on one hand, and White and Zuffa, on the other, have agreed to extend the date for Hunt to file his opposition one week to July 17, 2017. Hunt submits that good cause exists to extend the date his opposition is due based on the fact that Hunt's lead counsel is out of the office due to a pre-planned vacation, and will not return until after the date Hunt's opposition is due. Hunt's secondary counsel recently returned from a pre-planned vacation, and will be in a deposition that was scheduled several weeks ago on the date the opposition is due. The one-week extension will ensure that Hunt is able to prepare a meaningful and adequate response to White and Zuffa's Motion to Dismiss. Moreover, no hearing date has been set for the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. This is the first stipulation seeking to extend the deadline for Hunt's opposition to Zuffa and White's Motion to Dismiss.
Based on the foregoing, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court issue an Order extending the deadline for Hunt to file an opposition to Zuffa and White's Motion to Dismiss until July 17, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Based on the stipulation between plaintiff and defendants Zuffa, LLC and Dana White [ECF No. 80], which I treat as a joint motion under LR 7-1(c), IT IS SO ORDERED.
