Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Allstate Insurance Company v. Belsky, 2:15-cv-2265-MMD-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180501621 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO [297] DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO [294] RENEWED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY (collectively referred to as the "Allstate Parties"), and Defendants & Counterclaimants MARJORIE BELSKY, MD; MARIO TARQUINO, MD; MARJORIE BELSKY, MD, INC., doi
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO [297] DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO [294] RENEWED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY (collectively referred to as the "Allstate Parties"), and Defendants & Counterclaimants MARJORIE BELSKY, MD; MARIO TARQUINO, MD; MARJORIE BELSKY, MD, INC., doing business as INTEGRATED PAIN SPECIALISTS; and MARIO TARQUINO, MD, INC., (collectively referred to as the "Belsky/Tarquino Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On April 4, 2018, the Allstate Parties filed their Renewed Motion for Attorneys' Fees [ECF No. 294] (the "Motion").

2. On April 18, 2018, the Belsky/Tarquino Parties filed their Response to the Motion [ECF No. 297] (the "Response").

3. The Allstate Parties presently have until April 25, 2018 to file their Reply to the Response to the Motion. Due to the Allstate Parties' counsel's preparation for a May 3, 2018 trial in an unrelated matter, the Allstate Parties shall now have until May 2, 2018 to file their Reply to the Response to the Motion.

4. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to file the Reply to the Response to the Motion. This stipulation is made in good faith and not to delay the proceedings.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer