Furniture Royal, Inc. v. Schnadig International Corp., 2:18-cv-00318. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180504h27
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 03, 2018
Latest Update: May 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff FURNITURE ROYAL INC., a Nevada Corporation ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant SCHNADIG INTERNATIONAL CORP., d/b/a CARACOLE, a North Carolina Corporation, ("Schnadig") hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Schnadig's Motion to Dismiss shall be e
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff FURNITURE ROYAL INC., a Nevada Corporation ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant SCHNADIG INTERNATIONAL CORP., d/b/a CARACOLE, a North Carolina Corporation, ("Schnadig") hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Schnadig's Motion to Dismiss shall be ex..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
(First Request)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff FURNITURE ROYAL INC., a Nevada Corporation ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant SCHNADIG INTERNATIONAL CORP., d/b/a CARACOLE, a North Carolina Corporation, ("Schnadig") hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Schnadig's Motion to Dismiss shall be extended ten (10) days up to and including May 21, 2018.
Defendant Schnadig's Motion to Dismiss was filed on April 27, 2018.
Plaintiff's response is currently due May 11, 2018. Plaintiff's requested this extension to which Defendant Schnadig courteously agreed in light of the complexity of the antitrust claims. No hearing date has been assigned for oral arguments.
This is the party's first request for an extension of Schnadig's time to respond to the Motion to Dismiss.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
