Elawyers Elawyers

Krupinski v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 2:18-cv-01388-RFB-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181126b47 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT [THIRD REQUEST] RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Michael Krupinski ("Plaintiff"), by and through counsel of record, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC ("Trans Union") have agreed and stipulated to the following: 1. On July 27, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1]. 2. On September 10, 2018, Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF Dkt.13]. 3. On S
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT [THIRD REQUEST]

Plaintiff Michael Krupinski ("Plaintiff"), by and through counsel of record, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC ("Trans Union") have agreed and stipulated to the following:

1. On July 27, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1].

2. On September 10, 2018, Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF Dkt.13].

3. On September 24, 2018, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 16].

4. On October 9, 2018 Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 23].

5. On October 24, 2018, the Court granted the parties' first stipulation to extend time. [ECF Dkt. 32].

6. On November 7, 2018, the Court granted the parties' second stipulation to extend time. [ECF Dkt. 35].

7. Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss is presently due on November 20, 2018. Since The parties' prior stipulated extension, the parties have made substantial progress towards potential resolution of the claims in this lawsuit, and expect that any such resolution will occur by early December, if at all. Consequently, in order to avoid burdening the Court with further motion practice that may be unnecessary, the parties request one final extension of Plaintiff's time to response to Trans Union's pending motion to dismiss, until December 4, 2018. This stipulation is made in good faith, is not interposed for delay, and is not filed for an improper purpose.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer