Filed: Dec. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY (First Request) KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JOE SMITH (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, Trevor J. Hatfield, of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendant, NICHOLAS & CO. FOODSERVICE, LLC. (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through its counsel, Anne T. Freeland, Esq. of MICHAEL BEST & FRI
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY (First Request) KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JOE SMITH (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, Trevor J. Hatfield, of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendant, NICHOLAS & CO. FOODSERVICE, LLC. (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through its counsel, Anne T. Freeland, Esq. of MICHAEL BEST & FRIE..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY
(First Request)
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JOE SMITH (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel, Trevor J. Hatfield, of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendant, NICHOLAS & CO. FOODSERVICE, LLC. (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through its counsel, Anne T. Freeland, Esq. of MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH, LLP, and do hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #17), that was filed on December 10, 2018, and an extension for Defendant to reply.
The reasons the extension is requested is that Plaintiff's response is due on December 31, 2018, which is in the middle of the holiday season. In addition, Plaintiff's counsel has a Mediation scheduled for December 21, 2018, in a Federal Court matter.
This request is submitted pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2 and LR II 7-1 and 26-4 and is the parties' first request for an extension of the time for the parties to respond to dispositive motion response deadlines. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have up to and including January 18, 2019 to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #17) and Defendant shall have up to and including February 1, 2019, to reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
